More Sandy Hook Unanswered Puzzles

February 26, 2016 | Categories: Guest Contributions | Tags: |  Print This Article

More Sandy Hook Unanswered Puzzles

I do not know what to make of these:

Sandy Hook dress rehersal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-aWGbGpatI

Here is a video showing that Sandy Hook school victim Noah Pozner was killed a second time in an attack on a Pakistani school: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkBe66x2zb4

Here is the evidence hearing for the Freedom of Information request by ablechild.org for Adam Lanza’s medical records and autopsy report. AbleChild is a 501c3 non-profit organization established to raise public awareness regarding the psychiatric labeling and drugging of children and the risks of mandatory mental health screening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi0tJ8eaNMY

Here is a report that AbleChild’s FOIA request was denied: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tEqDyRfho4 In other words, we have no evidence that Lanza was on drugs or that he died of a self-inflicted gunshot. This report also claims that there are no fingerprints or DNA evidence that links Lanza to the weapons allegedly used or the bullets to the alleged weapons. Whatever the real story, agendas such as gun control and mandatory mental health services for children have benefitted from Sandy Hook.

Here is a collage of photos taken by officials the day after the alleged Sandy Hook school shooting. The collage is assembled by a person who identifies himself as a civil engineer. He
concludes that the school was in disrepair and not in use at the time of the alleged shooting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZlSsNJqnUI

It seems to me that it is very easy to determine whether the school was in use or abandoned and closed. Put school officials under oath. Put neighbors of the school under oath. Put the teaching staff under oath. Show the utility bills. And so forth.

Event after event the government says that the only relevant evidence is what the government says. An honest and independent media and an aware public would not accept so many suspicious events in which the only evidence is what the government says.