On January 6, 2004, Senator Charles Schumer (D, NY) and I scandalized the economics profession and Washington policymakers with our New York Times article, Second Thoughts on Free Trade. We noted that the two conditions on which the case for free trade rests no longer exist in the present-day world and that there was no basis for the assumption that offshoring of US jobs was beneficial overall to Americans.
The Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., organized a conference, televised by C-Span, to subject our argument to peer review, and we easily dominated the conference.
Business Week (March 22, 2004) was receptive to a column from me explaining the adverse effects of offshoring, and Tim Aeppel at the Wall Street Journal organized an online debate between myself and Columbia University trade theorist Jagdish Bhagwati.
Aeppel hoped to test the validity of my points in the crucible of debate with a leading academic proponent of offshoring. However, Bhagwati evaded my argument and threatened to withdraw his participation if my reference to the latest work in trade theory by Ralph Gomory and William Baumol was included in the edited version of our debate in the Wall Street Journal (May 10, 2004). In Global Trade and Conflicting National Interests published in 2000 by the M.I.T. Press, Gomory and Baumol show that the case for free trade is a special case and had never been one of general validity. Their criticism is more far-reaching than the one made by me and Senator Schumer.
Professor Bhagwati’s skill in evading my argument told most people who read the edited version of our debate that he could not answer me. Obviously, all was not well with the establishment’s contentment with offshoring and “globalism.”
Paul Samuelson, in many respects the dean of American economists, wrote an article supportive of Gomory and Baumol’s work. [Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization, Journal of Economic Perspectives—Summer 2004 (PDF)] But nothing happened. Economists simply closed ranks and ignored the points that I brought to their attention as well as the latest work in trade theory. Libertarian free trade ideologues got upset with me. Unable to deny that the case for free trade had lost its necessary foundations, libertarians reduced the issue to one of economic freedom and concluded that I was impure.
Since 2004 I have written a number of articles pointing out that offshoring is really labor arbitrage and that if offshoring had the mutual economic benefits associated with free trade, there would be US employment growth in export and import-competitive industries. Instead, employment in these industries has declined in the US but grown remarkably in Asia. In the 21st century the US economy has been able to create net new jobs only in nontradable domestic services, such as waitresses and bartenders and health and social services. Moreover, the growth in productivity and GDP attributed to the US economy were inconsistent with the stagnant real incomes of Americans. Somehow productivity and GDP were growing strongly, but it wasn’t showing up in the incomes of Americans.
Economists have found it difficult to think about the issues that I have raised. Economists are taught that free trade is a good thing and that anyone who disputes it is a protectionist in the pay of some industry scheming to raise prices that consumers have to pay. The notion that there could be any problem with free trade is beyond the imagination of most economists.
In addition to their unexamined commitment to free trade, economists disbelieved my analysis because they thought it was inconsistent with statistics indicating high US productivity and GDP growth. They thought GDP and productivity statistics trumped my use of job data.
All of this may be about to change. Susan N. Houseman, a good but previously obscure economist with the Upjohn Institute, has discovered a problem in the statistical data that produces phantom US GDP. Phantom GDP results when cost reductions achieved by US firms shifting production offshore are miscounted as US GDP growth. Phantom productivity increases occur when gains from moving design, research and development offshore are counted as increases in US productivity. Obviously, production and productivity that take place abroad are not part of our domestic economy.
Business Week‘s June 18 cover story by Michael Mandel [The Real Cost Of Offshoring] explains the problem identified by Houseman. Economist Matthew J. Slaughter, a proponent of offshoring, says: “There are potentially big implications. I worry about how pervasive this is.” Business Week says the implications are big. The cover story estimates that 40% of the gain in US manufacturing output since 2003 is phantom GDP.
Most likely that estimate is low. Consider, for example, that furniture imports have doubled in the past few years (offshored production counts as imports) while US jobs in furniture manufacture have declined 21%. US statistics, however, show that US output and productivity rose even as US manufacturers closed their plants and no new investment went into the industry.
My hat is off to Business Week. It requires courage for a publication dependent on advertising from global corporations to tell the truth about offshoring.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now available. The comment section is for comments on the content of the articles. Monitors using their discretion will remove extraneous and unrelated comments. Blanket condemnations of entire races, ethnicities, and religions will be removed. Comments must be polite and free of foul language. Repeated misuse of the comment section will result in your IP being banned. Please login to comment.
No Jobs, No Economy, No Prospects For Peace Or Life — Paul Craig Roberts
Obama Comes Out Against Self-Determination — Paul Craig Roberts
The Looting Of Ukraine Has Begun
Propaganda Rules The News –Paul Craig Roberts
The end could be nearer than you think — Paul Craig Roberts
Washington’s Arrogance, Hubris, and Evil Have Set the Stage for War
Ukrainian Neo-Nazis Declare that Power Comes Out of the Barrels of their Guns
The Crisis In Ukraine — Paul Craig Roberts
Democracy Murdered By Protest — Ukraine Falls To Intrigue and violence
Is Ukraine Drifting Toward Civil War And Great Power Confrontation?
Amerikan Stasi Police State Staring Us In The Face — Paul Craig Roberts
Global Capitalism Has Written Off The Human Race — Paul Craig Roberts
US and EU Are Paying Ukrainian Rioters and Protesters — Paul Craig Roberts
Russia Under Attack — Paul Craig Roberts
The Five Criminals: In America the Gestapo Has Replaced The Rule Of Law
Washington Orchestrated Protests Are Destabilizing Ukraine
Obamacare: The Final Payment–Raiding the Assets of Low-Income and Poor Americans
Market Manipulations Become More Extreme, More Desperate
Washington Destabilizes Ukraine
Should The Minimum Wage Be Raised? — Paul Craig Roberts
What Is Supply-Side Economics? — Paul Craig Roberts
Why is the Fed tapering?
How Junk Economists Help The Rich Impoverish The Working Class — Paul Craig Roberts
How Economists and Policymakers Murdered Our Economy — Paul Craig Roberts
The Hows and Whys of Gold Price Manipulation
No Jobs For Americans — Paul Craig Roberts
The Case of the Missing Recovery — Paul Craig Roberts
2014 Will Bring More Social Collapse — Paul Craig Roberts
The Greatest Gift for All — Paul Craig Roberts
Manipulations Rule The Markets — Paul Craig Roberts
Washington Has Discredited America — Paul Craig Roberts
Washington Drives the World Toward War — Paul Craig Roberts
More Misleading Official Employment Statistics — Paul Craig Roberts
Defeated By The Taliban, Washington Decides To Take On Russia And China — Paul Craig Roberts
The Money Changers Serenade: A New Plot Hatches — Paul Craig Roberts
The Dying Dollar — Paul Craig Roberts
The Kennedy Assassination (November 22, 1963) 50 Years Later
Bin Laden’s Obituary Notice
What Is The Real Agenda Of The American Police State? — Paul Craig Roberts
How America Was Lost — Paul Craig Roberts
Escape From The Dollar — Mike Whitney Interviews Paul Craig Roberts
Is Paul Krugman a Voodoo Economist? — Paul Craig Roberts
Ignored Reality Is Going To Wipe Out the Human Race — Paul Craig Roberts
As Ye Sow, So Shall Ye Reap — Paul Craig Roberts
A Potpourri of Exciting Reading — Paul Craig Roberts
Pakistan TV Exposes bin Laden Killing Hoax and Documentary Exposes 9/11 Official Story
Stand Up Americans — Paul Craig Roberts
Whatever Became Of Western Civilization? — Paul Craig Roberts
A Caesar In Our Future? — Paul Craig Roberts
Leave a comment
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now available.
The comment section is for comments on the content of the articles. Monitors using their discretion will remove extraneous and unrelated comments. Blanket condemnations of entire races, ethnicities, and religions will be removed. Comments must be polite and free of foul language. Repeated misuse of the comment section will result in your IP being banned.
Please login to comment.